The last two years have been riddled with illogical rules and policies. It is a mystery to me how some people can actually still buy this narrative. So here are my top arguments against a dangerous pandemic.
When you entered a restaurant, you had to wear a mask. You could take it off as soon as you sat down to eat (https://bit.ly/3uhzQOU - see bullet point #3). No single virus solely hovers at an altitude of 1.50m and above or double-checks whether someone is eating/drinking before choosing that person as a host.
The goalposts regarding the vaccine's efficacy are constantly shifting (https://bit.ly/3KZJITo). We all remember that self-proclaimed experts such as Fauci and Drosten claimed to achieve herd immunity against a respiratory virus (LOL!) at a vaccination rate of 60%. Now, the countries with the highest vaccination rates suffer from the highest number of cases. Surprise, surprise!
There is no robust scientific evidence that masks work (https://t.me/goddek/1169). However, there is much evidence that masks harm those who wear them (https://bit.ly/3LczvDx). And yet, people in many countries still have to wear such masks throughout the day - even outside. This raises the suspicion that they are primarily used to gag us and serve as a daily reminder that we are in the middle of a "deadly pandemic".
The majority of the experts presented in the media have substantial conflicts of interest, such as being funded by the Welcome Trust, the Gates Foundation or Big Pharma (https://bit.ly/3HoDuKH). As a result, independent scientists with dissenting opinions are pigeon-holed as dangerous heretics.
Big Tech bans dissidents who question the official narrative. I, for instance, have been removed from social media platforms for spreading "dangerous misinformation about Covid-19". There is nothing dangerous about facts about viral evolution, the efficacy of Ivermectin, or citing my own vitamin D publication (https://t.me/goddek/1149). Worse still, it is currently being debated to ban alternative social media, such as Telegram, as it provides a platform for "dangerous" alternative opinions (https://bit.ly/3ghT8f3). The truth is that we are a danger to their narrative, which is why they are fighting us.
There is no single need to vaccinate young people or children that are not exposed to any risk of becoming seriously ill. The narrative that "they need to get vaccinated to make sure that the vaccines of others work" is a mixture of illogicality and absurdity. Alternative treatment methods such as using Ivermectin have been fiercely criticized by so-called "experts" right from the beginning, even though the body of evidence was already overwhelming back then (https://c19ivermectin.com).
Politicians never cared about our health; otherwise, they would long have enlightened us about the importance of vitamin D, physical exercise, a healthy diet etc. It speaks volumes that the first thing they closed were sports clubs while locking us up at home so food delivery companies could flourish. Obesity is associated with a much higher risk of hospitalization (https://bit.ly/3Hf0Pym). And yet, many obese politicians argue for compulsory vaccinations instead of using a treadmill. Well done, hypocrites!
There are many more signs that this is a big hoax. What is your favourite one? Leave a comment below.
Cheers and remain sane,
Dr. Simon
The most obvious sign for me was the hysteria with which they demanded the vaccines. They just wanted us to take them too badly. Also the demonization of ivermectin and hydroxychlorquin and the fact that they failed to recommend a healthy lifestyle. Or any other mitigating options. They only offered one solution and that's just crazy talk!!
For me, the evidence since April 2020 that it was a complete hoax was the use of a PCR test that was not, and will never be, validated against a clinical gold standard. Instead, the test itself, in a triumph of circular logic, was declared to be the gold standard!